Vicariance and adaptation in a common temperate ophiuroids

Congratulations to Emilie (and her colleagues) for their new paper in Molecular Ecology. It has just been accepted. Find below the details of this nice paper.


Title: Did vicariance and adaptation drive cryptic speciation and evolution of brooding in Ophioderma longicauda (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), a common atlanto-mediterranean ophiuroid?


Authors: Emilie Boissin, Sabine Stohr and Anne Chenuil

Abstract: Over the last decade, cryptic speciation has been discovered in an increasing number of taxa. Species complexes are useful models for the understanding of speciation processes. Motivated by the discovery of brooding specimens in the common Atlanto-Mediterranean broadcast spawning brittle star, Ophioderma longicauda, a recent study revealed the occurrence of divergent mitochondrial lineages. We analysed 218 specimens from 23 locations spread over the geographic range of the species with partial Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences. A subset of this sample was also surveyed with the internal transcribed spacer of the ribosomal DNA cluster (nuclear ITS-1). Our study revealed six highly divergent mitochondrial lineages and the ITS-1 data confirmed that they most likely represent a species complex. Geographic ranges, abundances and genetic structures are contrasted among the putative cryptic species. Lineages in which brooding specimens have been found form a monophyletic group and are restricted to the Eastern Mediterranean basin, an oligotrophic zone. A phylogeny-trait association analysis revealed a phylogenetic signal for low  ‘chlorophyll a’ values (our proxy for oligotrophy). An ecological shift related to the hyper oligotrophy of the Eastern Mediterranean region is therefore likely to have played a role in the evolution of brooding. This study revealed that a complex mixture of vicariance, population expansion, adaptive divergence and possibly high local diversification rates resulting from brooding has shaped the evolution of this species complex. The dating analysis showed that these events probably occurred in the Pleistocene epoch.

Brooded juvenile (SEM image) and adult (picture) of Ophioderma longicauda 

JC_29.08.11_minutes

In our journal club from last Monday, we discussed an interesting paper by McGovern and co-workers: “Divergence genetics analysis reveal historical population processes leading to contrasting phylogeographic patterns in co-distributed species” (Molecular Ecology, 2010, 19, 5043–5060).

The paper emphasizes the importance of taking into consideration the historical perspective when studying any spatial genetic pattern. A phylogeographic break does not necessarily means that the gene flow is currently restricted (that’s what is happening in the bat star across QCS). The contrary is also true a more subtle differentiation at this break is not equals to a greater contemporaneous gene flow (instead it can be due to a more recent divergence time, this is what is happening in the snail).

Contrary to the extrapolation of gene flow from traditional Fst, the software IMa does not make assumptions of equilibrium (genetic drift/mutation/migration) and allows disentangling between ancestral polymorphism and ongoing gene flow. A good paper to read about this topic is the paper accessible in the September edition of TREE from Marko & Hart (The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference, Trends in Ecology and Evolution September 2011, Vol. 26, No. 9).

We also discussed the extirpation of the snail and the recolonization range. Why was the snail extirpated if it is the cold species of the two? And when did it recolonize this entire range? Indeed, the date of divergence between north and south populations does not approximate the recolonization but just the population split. The recolonization of the north by the snails could have happened any time between 282000 and 11000-17000 years ago.

We discussed the possible causes explaining the fact that the older event in the bat star (282000) was visible by AMOVA but not the more recent one (100000). Maybe a difference in the duration of the separation is the explanation, given that gene flow seems homogeneous across the range of the bat star.

We also discussed the problems of using a single gene. We talked about selection and the difference of informativeness/variability between nuclear and mitochondrial markers.

We discussed about the choice of the markers, particularly tRNAs, and the importance of the calibration in the dating of divergence time.