Date
|
Name
|
Venue
|
12 Mar
|
Kerry
|
Tea room
|
19 Mar
|
Sarita
|
Tea room
|
26 Mar
|
Sam
|
Tea room
|
2 Apr
|
Arrie
|
Tea room
|
16 Apr
|
Thierry
|
Tea room
|
23 Apr
|
Emilie
|
Tea room
|
7 May
|
Ilkser
|
Tea room
|
14 May
|
Catherine
|
Tea room
|
21 May
|
Amanda
|
Tea room
|
28 May
|
Paulette
|
Tea room
|
4 June
|
Bianca
|
Tea room
|
11 June
|
Michael
|
Tea room
|
18 June
|
Angelika
|
Tea room
|
25 June
|
Carel
|
Tea room
|
A blog about the lab life of the Molecular Ecology and Evolutionary Program at the University of Pretoria
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Journal Club Sessions (Semester 1)
Monday, March 19, 2012
The historical Biogeography of Mammalia
From MS Springer, RW Meredith, JE Janecka and WJ Murphy, Philosophical Transactions of the Royale Society B, (2011) 366, 2478–2502 [doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0023]
Title: The historical biogeography of Mammalia
Abstract. Palaeobiogeographic reconstructions are underpinned by phylogenies, divergence times and ancestral area reconstructions, which together yield ancestral area chronograms that provide a basis for proposing and testing hypotheses of dispersal and vicariance. Methods for area coding include multi-state coding with a single character, binary coding with multiple characters and string coding. Ancestral reconstruction methods are divided into parsimony versus Bayesian/likelihood approaches. We compared nine methods for reconstructing ancestral areas for placental mammals. Ambiguous reconstructions were a problem for all methods. Important differences resulted from coding areas based on the geographical ranges of extant species versus the geographical provenance of the oldest fossil for each lineage. Africa and South America were reconstructed as the ancestral areas for Afrotheria and Xenarthra, respectively. Most methods reconstructed Eurasia as the ancestral area for Boreoeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria. The coincidence of molecular dates for the separation of Afrotheria and Xenarthra at approximately 100 Ma with the plate tectonic sundering of Africa and South America hints at the importance of vicariance in the early history of Placentalia. Dispersal has also been important including the origins of Madagascar’s endemic mammal fauna. Further studies will benefit from increased taxon sampling and the application of new ancestral area reconstruction methods.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Journal Club Sessions (Semester 1)
| Date | Name | Venue |
| 16 Jan | Arrie | 7-34 |
| 23 Jan | Thierry | 7-34 |
| 30 Jan | Emilie | 7-34 |
| 6 Feb | Ilkser | 7-34 |
| 13 Feb | Catherine | 7-34 |
| 20 Feb | Amanda | Tea room / Office |
| 27 Feb | Paulette | Tea room / Office |
| 5 Mar | Carel | Tea room / Office |
| 12 Mar | Kerry | Tea room / Office |
| 19 Mar | Sarita | 7-34 |
| 26 Mar | Sam | 7-34 |
| 2 Apr | Arrie | 7-34 |
| 16 Apr | Thierry | 7-34 |
| 23 Apr | Emilie | 7-34 |
| 7 May | Ilkser | 7-34 |
| 14 May | Catherine | 7-34 |
| 21 May | Angelika | 7-34 |
| 28 May | Paulette | 7-34 |
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Microsatellite development in the Moorish Idol
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Design of hybrid primers
Friday, September 2, 2011
Vicariance and adaptation in a common temperate ophiuroids
Congratulations to Emilie (and her colleagues) for their new paper in Molecular Ecology. It has just been accepted. Find below the details of this nice paper.
Title: Did vicariance and adaptation drive cryptic speciation and evolution of brooding in Ophioderma longicauda (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), a common atlanto-mediterranean ophiuroid?
Authors: Emilie Boissin, Sabine Stohr and Anne Chenuil
Thursday, September 1, 2011
JC_29.08.11_minutes
In our journal club from last Monday, we discussed an interesting paper by McGovern and co-workers: “Divergence genetics analysis reveal historical population processes leading to contrasting phylogeographic patterns in co-distributed species” (Molecular Ecology, 2010, 19, 5043–5060).
The paper emphasizes the importance of taking into consideration the historical perspective when studying any spatial genetic pattern. A phylogeographic break does not necessarily means that the gene flow is currently restricted (that’s what is happening in the bat star across QCS). The contrary is also true a more subtle differentiation at this break is not equals to a greater contemporaneous gene flow (instead it can be due to a more recent divergence time, this is what is happening in the snail).
Contrary to the extrapolation of gene flow from traditional Fst, the software IMa does not make assumptions of equilibrium (genetic drift/mutation/migration) and allows disentangling between ancestral polymorphism and ongoing gene flow. A good paper to read about this topic is the paper accessible in the September edition of TREE from Marko & Hart (The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference, Trends in Ecology and Evolution September 2011, Vol. 26, No. 9).
We also discussed the extirpation of the snail and the recolonization range. Why was the snail extirpated if it is the cold species of the two? And when did it recolonize this entire range? Indeed, the date of divergence between north and south populations does not approximate the recolonization but just the population split. The recolonization of the north by the snails could have happened any time between 282000 and 11000-17000 years ago.
We discussed the possible causes explaining the fact that the older event in the bat star (282000) was visible by AMOVA but not the more recent one (100000). Maybe a difference in the duration of the separation is the explanation, given that gene flow seems homogeneous across the range of the bat star.
We also discussed the problems of using a single gene. We talked about selection and the difference of informativeness/variability between nuclear and mitochondrial markers.
We discussed about the choice of the markers, particularly tRNAs, and the importance of the calibration in the dating of divergence time.


